By the half way point I was wondering if the 50mm lens was really a nature lens for my taste at all. I was constantly wanting more compression (like what I would get with a telephoto lens) or more near/far exaggeration (like with a wider angle.)
But like any time I limit myself with only one lens, I have to find what that lens can do well and use it to its strength. I soon was seeing what this focal length would see, and pushing myself to make photos, instead of finding them.
I am realizing that I am not a nature photographer. Well, I like nature, but I like human elements in my nature photos. Like the nature is the scene that this person is enjoying...or like the person is the subject of my sentence, and the nature element is the adjective. (But that is another subject entirely.) So, I feel like the 50mm was able to perform for me in this respect.
I am not sure if I will do this 50mm only exercise again (by myself that is) but I do like the exercise and I really do like carrying only a small camera setup. I was never weighed down, and felt like I was free to hike, and enjoy nature more. I will have to try other focal lengths sometime too.
Now, if we are talking portraits, this lens goes up a little in my book. In fact, one weekend I shot an entire (almost) portrait session with just a 50mm. See that here.
.
1 comment:
Once again, great stuff Matt. -craig.
Post a Comment